SB827: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 === Sierra Club, California ===
-Letter, 18 January 2018:&nbsp; "[https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nm631DiM-zUUPsGagCC_hQRaK7P0WHBm RE: SB 827 (Wiener) Planning and Zoning: Transit-Rich Housing Bonus-- OPPOSE]."<br/> &nbsp;
+Letter, 18 January 2018:&nbsp; "[https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nm631DiM-zUUPsGagCC_hQRaK7P0WHBm RE: SB 827 (Wiener) Planning and Zoning: Transit-Rich Housing Bonus-- OPPOSE]."<br/> <br/> Tweet (tagged #NoOn827):&nbsp;[https://twitter.com/SierraClubCA/status/955833528343699456 https://twitter.com/SierraClubCA/status/955833528343699456]<br/> &nbsp;
-[https://twitter.com/SierraClubCA/status/955833528343699456 https://twitter.com/SierraClubCA/status/955833528343699456]<br/> &nbsp;
-&nbsp;
-&nbsp;
 == Summary&nbsp; ==
-[[File:Joe-Rivano-Barros-SB827-SF-map.jpg|thumb|right|400px|tweet by Joe Rivano Barros on SB 827]]<br/> A housing development would be eligible for a transit-rich housing bonus
+[[File:Joe-Rivano-Barros-SB827-SF-map.jpg|thumb|right|400px|tweet by Joe Rivano Barros on SB 827]]A housing development would be eligible for a transit-rich housing bonus
 *A) if within one-quarter mile radius of a high-quality transit corridor, or within one block of a major transit stop:
@@ Line 280: / Line 274: @@
+&nbsp;
 &nbsp;