SB827: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
@Hyper_lexic<br/> I think it might go too far in the reach - minimum 45’ zoning on current residential side streets would be a real shock.<br/> |
@Hyper_lexic<br/> I think it might go too far in the reach - minimum 45’ zoning on current residential side streets would be a real shock.<br/> |
||
| Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
*Residents displaced by redevelopment should have preferential placement in any affordable units built by [https://twitter.com/hashtag/SB827?src=hash <s>#</s>'''SB827''']. Can't really do this with affordable projects funded by state/fed money, but maybe it's possible with private projects? |
*Residents displaced by redevelopment should have preferential placement in any affordable units built by [https://twitter.com/hashtag/SB827?src=hash <s>#</s>'''SB827''']. Can't really do this with affordable projects funded by state/fed money, but maybe it's possible with private projects? |
||
<br/> Ethan Elkin. "Mitigating Displacement Of Low-Income Renters From New Transit-Oriented Housing." January 9, 2018.<br/> |
<br/> Ethan Elkin. "Mitigating Displacement Of Low-Income Renters From New Transit-Oriented Housing." January 9, 2018. <br/> Suggestions: |
||
*ensure a percentage of the new homes built are available exclusively to people with low incomes. |
|||
*local residents who have been displaced or are at risk of displacement should have priority access to these new homes. |
|||
=== Upzoing could create pressure for less well-off homeowners to sell and relocate. === |
=== Upzoing could create pressure for less well-off homeowners to sell and relocate. === |
||