SB827: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 18:
== Concerns ==
=== Concerns and involvement of local resident stakeholders could be
Richard Hall @rihallix [https://twitter.com/rihallix/status/949786475071094784 3:35 PM - 6 Jan 2018] from San Rafael, CA<br/> Replying to @TaupeAvenger<br/> "The community no longer has a say. #sb827 forces zoning changes by state fiat. With #sb35 passed all voices of resident stakeholders, councils, mayors are forcibly suppressed. Developers take control."
Line 30:
@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747494371643394 6 Jan 2018]. <br/> "As for stopping cities from cutting bus routes, I would say do it based on current service *or* service that existed on Jan. 1, 2018."
=== Could lead to demolition and displacement in low-income areas ===
Line 39 ⟶ 38:
*blog post: "[http://www.crenshawsubway.org/sb_827_must_be_stopped_to_protect_south_la SB 827 Is a Declaration of War on South LA]." ''Crenshaw Subway Coalition ''blog, 5 Jan 2018.
=== new multi-story housing could negatively impact neighbors ===
=== Upzoing could create pressure for less well-off homeowners to sell and relocate. ===
Line 77 ⟶ 76:
=== Does, could, or would this lead to
|