SB827: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=== Transit could be cut back to circumvent the bill requirements === |
=== Transit could be cut back to circumvent the bill requirements === |
||
@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747494371643394 6 Jan 2018]. <br/> "As for stopping cities from cutting bus routes, I would say do it based on current service *or* service that existed on Jan. 1, 2018." |
|||
⚫ | |||
=== === |
|||
=== Could lead to demolition and displacement in low-income areas === |
=== Could lead to demolition and displacement in low-income areas === |
||
Line 48: | Line 50: | ||
|
|
||
=== Setback and lot coverage rules make the height limits weak. === |
|||
@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747033795153921 6 Jan 2018]. <br/> "Setbacks and lot coverage rules that make the height limits weak. I would recommend forcing cities to accommodate FAR 2 within 45' zones, FAR 2.5 in 55' zones, and FAR 4 in 85' zones. |
|||
== transit frequency needs to be better defined == |
|||
@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747331099918338 6 Jan 2018]:<br/> "15-min headways needs to be defined more specifically. I would recommend defining it as total service along a route (so interlining is okay), and define it as, say, four buses within the 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. hours." |
|||
Bjorn @Zmapper [https://twitter.com/Zmapper/status/949777447456772096 6 Jan 2018]: <br/> "Suggestion: Count frequency by number of buses per stop per day (set to equal roughly 15-min/hour frequency) to minimize political service cuts." |
|||
Sandy Johnston<br/> <br/> <br/> @sandypsj<br/> "This would treat frequent peak service+infrequent off-peak equally, whereas we should probably be incentivizing frequent all-day service." |
|||
@alon_levy<br/> Counterpoint: it's easier for NIMBYs to cut off-peak than peak frequency, because their own transit use is very peaky. |
|||
@alon_levy<br/> "The transit agency isn't run by NIMBYs, and 8-story density naturally fills more buses at low subsidy." |
|||
removing parking requirements will be infeasible or unacceptable |
|||
@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747942856019974 6 Jan 2018]: <br/> "I love zeroing out parking requirements, but it seems like it might be a bit hard for some to swallow. Could permit requiring up to 0.5 spaces/bedroom, up to 1 space per unit, along the bus routes (not rail though) if there's pushback." |
|||
Tony Jordan @twjpdx23 6 Jan 2018: <br/> "How about they can only require parking if they have robust parking demand management in place first?" |
|||
"Basically, if they're not attempting to manage on street demand through permit pricing, then they shouldn't be complaining about zeroing out parking requirements, imo." |
|||
⚫ | |||
Does, could, or would this lead to mixed-use development |
|||
|
|||
=== Pending nuclear holocaust makes planning exercises like this pointless === |
|||
from @BelmontRenters (Kevin Burke). |
|||
|
|||
=== thread from Brian Hanlon (@CAyimby) calling for issues === |
|||
some of above, and possible more issues noted in thread: <br/> @hanlonbt 11:36 AM - [https://twitter.com/hanlonbt/status/949726260128899073 6 Jan 2018]<br/> "Please send me common objections to SB 827, thinks like concerns about demolition, reduction in bus service, etc... Thanks!<br/> |
|||
== References == |
== References == |