Anonymous user
Proposition 13: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Hm No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 46:
In addition, during the early 1960s, there were several scandals in California involving county assessors. These assessors were found rewarding friends and allies with artificially low assessments, with tax bills to match. These scandals led to the passage of AB 80 in 1966, which imposed standards to hold assessments to market value, which caused a large number of California homeowners to experience an immediate and drastic rise in valuation, simultaneous with rising tax rates on that assessed value, only to be told that the taxed monies would be redistributed to distant communities. The ensuing anger started to form into a backlash against property taxes which coalesced around Howard Jarvis, a former newspaperman and appliance manufacturer, turned taxpayer activist in retirement.
▼
== <br/> Consequences ==
Line 72:
== Reform-related Events / Forums ==
▲
September 9th, 2017 (Saturday) -10:30am to 12:30pm.<br/> Evolve.ca Town Hall event. <br/> Where: First Congregational Church of Oakland, 2501 Harrison St, Oakland, CA 94612.<br/> http://www.evolve-ca.org/town-hall-rsvp/
October 19 or 26 - possible event being planned by YIMBY Action. <br/> Proposed: Lilia Luciano (of Sacramento tv channel) is moderating, with Kim-Mai Cutler, Evolve.ca, California Association of Realtors, and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (original key sponsors of Proposition 13).
Line 81 ⟶ 85:
*Martin, Isaac William. ''The Permanent Tax Revolt: How the Property Tax Transformed American Politics''. Stanford University Press, 2008. <br/>
*Reisenwitz, Cathy. "[http://www.thebaycitybeacon.com/32740/289250/a/a-surprising-suggestion-for-the-prop-13-quagmire-guestopinion A Surprising Suggestion for the Prop 13 Quagmire [GuestOpinion].]" Bay City Beacon, May 22, 2017. [http://www.thebaycitybeacon.com/32740/289250/a/a-surprising-suggestion-for-the-prop-13-quagmire-guestopinion http://www.thebaycitybeacon.com/32740/289250/a/a-surprising-suggestion-for-the-prop-13-quagmire-guestopinion].<br/>
*Rosen, Kenneth T. "The Impact of Proposition 13 on House Prices in Northern California: A Test of the Interjurisdictional Capitalization Hypothesis." ''Journal of Political Economy'', Vol. 90, No. 1 (Feb., 1982), pp. 191-200.<br/> [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831240 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831240].<br/> Working paper, June 1980: [http://escholarship.org/uc/item/80t0102p [1]].<br/>
*Sexton, Terri A., Steven M. Sheffrin and Arthur O'Sullivan. "[https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_E90AYG2sPDVVBMaTRzTmZRMFU/view Proposition 13: Unintended Effects and Feasible Reforms.]" ''National Tax Journal'', Vol. 52, No. 1 (March, 1999), pp. 99-111<br/> [http://www.jstor.org/stable/41789379 http://www.jstor.org/stable/41789379].<br/> [https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_E90AYG2sPDVVBMaTRzTmZRMFU/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_E90AYG2sPDVVBMaTRzTmZRMFU/view],<br/>
*Wikipedia. "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_13_(1978) California Proposition 13 (1978)]." accessed 22 May, 2017.
| |||