Anonymous user
Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act reform: Difference between revisions
Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act reform (view source)
Revision as of 09:27, 12 January 2018
, 6 years agono edit summary
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 127:
== Proposals for revisions and alternative reforms ==
=== Rolling rent control ===
Line 134 ⟶ 135:
East Bay For Everyone: <br/> "we support a rolling phase in period for rent control of, for example, 10 years after the issuance of an occupancy permit, so that rent control does not render new homebuilding economically infeasible." <br/> In support letter for [[AB1506|AB1506]]. See [East Bay for Everyone, 2017].
<br/> “providing a rolling definition of what ‘new construction’ is.” - Rob Bonta, at Jan 11 2018 hearing. <br/>
@housingforLA supports.
<br/> alon_levy @alon_levy [https://twitter.com/alon_levy/status/951575113471754240 2:02 PM - 11 Jan 2018]<br/> Replying to @IDoTheThinking<br/> "Alternative: tie SB 827 with a statewide ban on rent control. All of today's RC units become market-rate at an integer # of tenancy years."
<br/> matthewplan @matthewplan [https://twitter.com/matthewplan/status/951743231095537664 1:10 AM - 12 Jan 2018]<br/> Replying to @weel @VamonosLA<br/> "The argument is let different cities make their own policies and not let Costa Hawkins tie hands. Though there likely should be some year limit - 25 years after construction - to ensure new construction isn’t impacted."
| |||