Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act reform: Difference between revisions

<blockquote>''“At the same time, while I understand why some want to put this change on the ballot, it is never ideal to address a complicated issue like this through the initiative process,” Bloom said. &nbsp;“First and foremost, the initiative process is a simple up or down vote that does not allow for any public input, shuts down dialogue amongst stakeholders, and prevents anyone from making changes to address any concerns raised by those impacted by the proposal.'' ''“Secondly, if there are unintended consequences down the road that need to be fixed, it will require a 2/3 vote of each house of the Legislature – a threshold not easily achieved. &nbsp;For these reasons, something this complicated is better left to the legislative process. AB 1506 remains a vehicle for responsible dialogue and, I hope, legislation that will ease the economic burden that is affecting so many Californians.”<br/> &nbsp;- quoted in&nbsp;''</blockquote>

&nbsp;

 

== Proposals for revisions and alternative reforms&nbsp; ==

 

=== Rolling rent control&nbsp; ===

 

(make rent control apply to buildings only after a certain time - 10, 20, 30 years.)<br/> <br/> “providing a rolling definition of what ‘new construction’ is.”&nbsp; - Rob Bonta, at Jan 11 2018 hearing.&nbsp;

from Jacob Woocher‏&nbsp; @jacobwooch&nbsp;[https://twitter.com/jacobwooch/status/951600045526171648 3:41 PM - 11 Jan 2018]:&nbsp;

 

 

&nbsp;

== References ==