Village Buildings bibliography: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 546:
 
Vail K (2016). "Saving the American Dream: The Legalization of the Tiny House Movement." ''U.Louisville L.Rev.'' 54: 357. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/branlaj54&div=18&g_sent=1&collection=journals.
 
Vimalakirti. (5th-6thC BCE). ''Vimalakirti Nirdesa Sutra'', translated by Robert A. F. Thurman. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1976. https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln260/Vimalakirti.htm
 
Vasudevan, Alex. (2017). ''The Autonomous City: A History of Urban Squatting''. 2017.  
Line 555 ⟶ 557:
Walker, Lester (2000). ''A Little House of My Own: 47 Grand Designs for 47 Tiny Houses''. 2000. [? check for earlier edition]
 
Wacquant, Loïc. “Designing Urban Seclusion in the Twenty-First Century: The 2009 Roth-Symonds Lecture." ''Perspecta'', vol. 43, 2010, pp. 164–175. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41680282. <blockquote>"We can then distribute the ideal-typical forms of sociospatial seclusion in the two-dimensional space defined by those two axes (see Figure 1): elective versus forced, at I the top or at the bottom. Looking at the top right-hand side quadrant, on the choice side and high in social and physical space, you find those people who choose isolation and seek privacy, who wish to be among the likes of themselves or to avoid debased populations and unsavory activities. This is self -seclusion at the top fueled by in-group orientation is represented by elite enclaves or traditional upper-class districts in the city....So at the top you find noble activities, exercised by powerful persons, endowed with the material and symbolic capital to exclude others and to self-seclude, while at the bottom are bunched up ignoble activities and tainted populations deprived of economic and cultural capital, the dispossessed and the dishonored."
Ward, Colin.&nbsp;''Housing: An Anarchist Approach&nbsp;''(1976).&nbsp;https://libcom.org/library/colin-ward-housing-anarchist-approach. &nbsp;
 
"The prosecutorial approach commonly adopted by social analysts has prevented them from recognizing that the ghetto is a two-faced contraption: it is at once and inseparably an instrument of subordination and a conduit for protection, ! unification, and cohesion. We must be alert to the hidden and counterintuitive benefits of ghettoization, which offers a subordinate ethnoracial category a vehicle for self-organization and mobilization and thence allows them to leverage their 'power from below.'" [referring to argument of his forthcoming book ''The Two Faces of the Ghetto''].</blockquote><brWard, Colin.&nbsp;''Housing: An Anarchist Approach&nbsp;''(1976).&nbsp;https:/>/libcom.org/library/colin-ward-housing-anarchist-approach. &nbsp;
 
Ward, Colin.&nbsp;''Talking Houses.&nbsp;''(London: Freedom House, 1990).&nbsp;
Line 585 ⟶ 589:
Webb, Philip. (2014). ''Homeless Lives in American Cities: Interrogating Myth and Locating Community''. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. <nowiki>ISBN 9781349476893</nowiki>.
 
Wikipedia (English).
Wikipedia. "Dignity Village."&nbsp;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignity_Village. Accessed 17 Oct 2019. &nbsp;
 
Wikipedia___. "Dignity Village."&nbsp;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignity_Village. Accessed 17 Oct 2019. &nbsp;
 
___. "Jack Tafari."&nbsp;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Tafari. Accessed 17 Oct 2019.&nbsp;
 
___. "Dome City."&nbsp;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dome_Village. Accessed 18 Nov 2019.&nbsp;
 
___. "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vimalakirti Vimalakirti]", accessed 26 June 2020).
 
Willse, Craig (2010). "Neo-liberal Biopolitics and the Invention of Chronic Homelessness." ''Economy and Society'' 39, No. 2 (2010): 155-84. &nbsp;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228340557_Neo-liberal_biopolitics_and_the_invention_of_chronic_homelessness.
Line 597 ⟶ 605:
Wright, Talmudge. (1997). ''Out of Place: Homeless mobilizations, subcities, and contested landscapes.'' Albany: State University of New York Press.
 
Wyatt, Anne (2014) "Rethinking Shelter and Tiny House Communities: Dignity Village, Portland, and Lessons from San Luis Obispo," Focus: Vol. 11: Issue&nbsp;1, Article 14.&nbsp;http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/focus/vol11/iss1/14.<blockquote></blockquote><br />
 
Wacquant, Loïc. “Designing Urban Seclusion in the Twenty-First Century: The 2009 Roth-Symonds Lecture." ''Perspecta'', vol. 43, 2010, pp. 164–175. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41680282. <blockquote>"We can then distribute the ideal-typical forms of sociospatial seclusion in the two-dimensional space defined by those two axes (see Figure 1): elective versus forced, at I the top or at the bottom. Looking at the top right-hand side quadrant, on the choice side and high in social and physical space, you find those people who choose isolation and seek privacy, who wish to be among the likes of themselves or to avoid debased populations and unsavory activities. This is self -seclusion at the top fueled by in-group orientation is represented by elite enclaves or traditional upper-class districts in the city....So at the top you find noble activities, exercised by powerful persons, endowed with the material and symbolic capital to exclude others and to self-seclude, while at the bottom are bunched up ignoble activities and tainted populations deprived of economic and cultural capital, the dispossessed and the dishonored."
 
"The prosecutorial approach commonly adopted by social analysts has prevented them from recognizing that the ghetto is a two-faced contraption: it is at once and inseparably an instrument of subordination and a conduit for protection, ! unification, and cohesion. We must be alert to the hidden and counterintuitive benefits of ghettoization, which offers a subordinate ethnoracial category a vehicle for self-organization and mobilization and thence allows them to leverage their 'power from below.'" [referring to argument of his forthcoming book ''The Two Faces of the Ghetto''].</blockquote><br />