Village Buildings bibliography: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
*Allport, Gordon W. (1954). ''The Nature of Prejudice.'' Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1954. Full text available at: <nowiki>https://archive.org/details/TheNatureOfPrejudice</nowiki>. <blockquote>''"The checkerboard of prejudice in the United States is perhaps the most intricate of all."'' .<br />''"Everywhere on earth we find a condition of separateness among groups. People mate with their own kind. They eat, play, reside in homogeneous clusters...Much of this automatic cohesion is due to nothing more than convenience...most of the business of life can go on with less effort it we stick together with our own kind." (p.17-18).'' .<br />''"Open-mindedness is considered to be a virtue. But, strictly speaking, it cannot occur. A new experience must be redacted into old categories. We cannot handle each even freshly in its own right." p.20'' .<br />''"Contrary evidence is not admitted and allowed to modify the generalization; rather it is perfunctorily acknowledged but excluded. Let us call this the 're-fencing' device. When a fact cannot fit into a mental field, the exception is acknowledged, but the field is hastily fenced in again and not allowed to remain dangerously open." p.23.'' <br />''"the very act of affirming our way of live often leads us to the brink of prejudice." p.24''</blockquote>
*Allport, Gordon W. (1954). ''The Nature of Prejudice.'' Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1954. Full text available at: <nowiki>https://archive.org/details/TheNatureOfPrejudice</nowiki>. <blockquote>''"The checkerboard of prejudice in the United States is perhaps the most intricate of all."'' .<br />''"Everywhere on earth we find a condition of separateness among groups. People mate with their own kind. They eat, play, reside in homogeneous clusters...Much of this automatic cohesion is due to nothing more than convenience...most of the business of life can go on with less effort it we stick together with our own kind." (p.17-18).'' .<br />''"Open-mindedness is considered to be a virtue. But, strictly speaking, it cannot occur. A new experience must be redacted into old categories. We cannot handle each even freshly in its own right." p.20'' .<br />''"Contrary evidence is not admitted and allowed to modify the generalization; rather it is perfunctorily acknowledged but excluded. Let us call this the 're-fencing' device. When a fact cannot fit into a mental field, the exception is acknowledged, but the field is hastily fenced in again and not allowed to remain dangerously open." p.23.'' <br />''"the very act of affirming our way of live often leads us to the brink of prejudice." p.24''</blockquote>
*Andersen, Michael. [2019] "Re-legalizing Fourplexes is the Unfinished Business of Tom McCall" &nbsp;["For decades, Oregon has used state law to battle economic segregation. Fair-housing experts say HB 2001 is the next step"]. Sightline.org, January 23, 2019.&nbsp;<br />
*Andersen, Michael. [2019] "Re-legalizing Fourplexes is the Unfinished Business of Tom McCall" &nbsp;["For decades, Oregon has used state law to battle economic segregation. Fair-housing experts say HB 2001 is the next step"]. Sightline.org, January 23, 2019.&nbsp;<br />
*Anderson, Michelle (2008). "Cities Inside Out: Race, Poverty, and Exclusion at the Urban Fringe." 55 UCLA L. REV. 1095 (2008). discussion of "unincorporated urban areas"<br />
*Anderson, Nels. (1923). ''The Hobo: The sociology of the homeless man''. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.<br /> &nbsp;
*Anderson, Nels. (1923). ''The Hobo: The sociology of the homeless man''. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.<br /> &nbsp;
*Anson, April. (2014). The World in my Backyard”: Romanticization, Thoreauvian Rhetoric, and Constructive Confrontation in the Tiny House Movement”. Research in Urban Sociology, 14, 289–314. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1047-004220140000014013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1047-004220140000014013]. PDF: [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F_bEq5Ba81Ahom-npyfx5cF_wtbP9Szu. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F_bEq5Ba81Ahom-npyfx5cF_wtbP9Szu.&nbsp;]<br/> &nbsp;
*Anson, April. (2014). The World in my Backyard”: Romanticization, Thoreauvian Rhetoric, and Constructive Confrontation in the Tiny House Movement”. Research in Urban Sociology, 14, 289–314. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1047-004220140000014013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1047-004220140000014013]. PDF: [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F_bEq5Ba81Ahom-npyfx5cF_wtbP9Szu. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F_bEq5Ba81Ahom-npyfx5cF_wtbP9Szu.&nbsp;]<br/> &nbsp;
Line 129: Line 130:
*Kropotkin, Peter. ''The Conquest of Bread''. (1892).&nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;
*Kropotkin, Peter. ''The Conquest of Bread''. (1892).&nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;
*Lagdameo, Jennifer Baum. "How Tiny Pods Are the Future For Portland's Houseless Community." ''Dwell'', August 21, 2017. [https://www.dwell.com/article/how-tiny-pods-are-the-future-for-portlands-houseless-community-657aa4a5. https://www.dwell.com/article/how-tiny-pods-are-the-future-for-portlands-houseless-community-657aa4a5.&nbsp;]<br /> &nbsp;
*Lagdameo, Jennifer Baum. "How Tiny Pods Are the Future For Portland's Houseless Community." ''Dwell'', August 21, 2017. [https://www.dwell.com/article/how-tiny-pods-are-the-future-for-portlands-houseless-community-657aa4a5. https://www.dwell.com/article/how-tiny-pods-are-the-future-for-portlands-houseless-community-657aa4a5.&nbsp;]<br /> &nbsp;
*Lakeman, Mark. "Dignity Village 2001 and Beyond: Outlining Strategies for a Sustainable Future."<br /> &nbsp;
*Lakeman, Mark. "Dignity Village 2001 and Beyond: Outlining Strategies for a Sustainable Future."<br />
*Larson, Jane E. (2002). "Informality, Illegality, and Inequality." 20 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 137 (2002).<br /> &nbsp;
*Loftus-Farren, Zoe (2011). "Tent Cities: An Interim Solution to Homelessness and Affordable Housing Shortages in the United States." ''California Law Review'', Vol. 99, No. 4 (August 2011), pp. 1037-1081. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uVh5h2ApWpUkutmo224euDMyodPmQSYY.<br /> &nbsp;
*Loftus-Farren, Zoe (2011). "Tent Cities: An Interim Solution to Homelessness and Affordable Housing Shortages in the United States." ''California Law Review'', Vol. 99, No. 4 (August 2011), pp. 1037-1081. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uVh5h2ApWpUkutmo224euDMyodPmQSYY.<br /> &nbsp;
*Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative. "Housing Innovation Challenge." https://www.housinginnovationchallenge.com/. Accessed 11 March 2019.&nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;
*Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative. "Housing Innovation Challenge." https://www.housinginnovationchallenge.com/. Accessed 11 March 2019.&nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;