Anonymous user
SB827: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 10:
#Any design standard that restricts the applicant’s ability to construct the maximum number of units consistent with any applicable building code."<br/>
== Resources (maps etc) ==
Line 23 ⟶ 24:
Policyclub.io SB 227 Interactive Los Angeles Map
[http://policyclub.io/sb-827 http://policyclub.io/sb-827]
Line 34 ⟶ 35:
*California YIMBY (bill primary sponsor)
*YIMBY Action
*Council of Infill Builders. (see support letter, [Council of Infill Builders 2018] in References)
*coalition of 120 tech executives and venture capitalists. [see support letter ___ ]<br/>
== Opponents ==
Line 41 ⟶ 43:
Letter, 18 January 2018: "[https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nm631DiM-zUUPsGagCC_hQRaK7P0WHBm RE: SB 827 (Wiener) Planning and Zoning: Transit-Rich Housing Bonus-- OPPOSE]."<br/> <br/> Tweet (tagged #NoOn827): [https://twitter.com/SierraClubCA/status/955833528343699456 https://twitter.com/SierraClubCA/status/955833528343699456]<br/>
=== Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguin ===
=== League of California Cities ===
"RE: SB 827 (Wiener) Planning and Zoning. Notice of Opposition (as introduced 1/3/18)" January 23, 2018.<br/> http://blob.capitoltrack.com/17blobs/315296bd-fe4c-4e2c-b021-f163c71f5e7e.
Line 52 ⟶ 62:
**55 feet if any side of the parcel faces a street less than 45 feet wide from curb to curb.
*B) if within one-half mile of a major transit stop, but not meeting (A), i.e. not within 1/4-mile radius of a high-quality transit corridor:
Line 283 ⟶ 295:
| |||