SB827: Difference between revisions

2,698 bytes added ,  6 years ago
no edit summary
imported>Jhestia
No edit summary
imported>Jhestia
No edit summary
Line 463:
 
 
 
=== Preserve local demolition controls ===
 
[note, this is arguably implicit in bill, since bill does not address or override them]. 
 
Dennis Richards‏&nbsp;@PlnCom_Richards&nbsp;[https://twitter.com/PlnCom_Richards/status/962378559837822976 9:31 AM - 10 Feb 2018]<br/> Replying to @MBridegam<br/> "If nothing is specifically written in SB827 about respecting local demolition controls it’s the Hoising Accountability Act that will override any demolition controls SF has caused by the upzoning through SB827."
 
Dennis Richards‏&nbsp;@PlnCom_Richards&nbsp;9:54 AM - 10 Feb 2018<br/> Replying to @marymcnamara @MBridegam<br/> "My personal opinion is that we need the clear deference to local demolition controls in SB827 which extends to all other state housing legislation. That’s what’s being promised as I understand it in this bill. Having it in SB827 but not the HAA makes it useless."
 
marymcnamara‏&nbsp;@marymcnamara&nbsp;10:07 AM - 10 Feb 2018<br/> Replying to @PlnCom_Richards @MBridegam<br/> "This seems to speak (I think) to my concern about a possible fatal flaw in SB827. &nbsp;That even if demolition control language is built into SB827, the Housing Accountability Act circumvents?"
 
YIMBYwiki‏&nbsp;@YIMBYwiki<br/> Replying to @PlnCom_Richards @marymcnamara @MBridegam<br/> "from the standpoint of housing advocates, this isn't necessarily a flaw, but may reflect a view that local 'demolition controls' can be a means to discretionarily exclude needed and zoning-compliant housing. Consider SF's list of bases: [http://sf-planning.org/sites/default/files/FileCenter/Documents/8462-RemovalDwellingUnits_ZoningControls_publication-030514.pdf http://sf-planning.org/sites/default/files/FileCenter/Documents/8462-RemovalDwellingUnits_ZoningControls_publication-030514.pdf]."&nbsp;
 
Scott Wiener‏ @Scott_Wiener&nbsp;[https://twitter.com/Scott_Wiener/status/962462328242413568 3:04 PM - 10 Feb 2018]<br/> Replying to @PlnCom_Richards @MBridegam<br/> "SB 827 does not override local demolition controls, but because of the misinformation that is swirling around, we are going to amend the bill to make extra explicit what is already the case: the bill will not alter or reduce local demolition controls."
 
YIMBYwiki‏&nbsp;@YIMBYwiki&nbsp;[https://twitter.com/YIMBYwiki/status/962522356206862336 7:03 PM - 10 Feb 2018]<br/> Replying to @Scott_Wiener @PlnCom_Richards @MBridegam<br/> "we'd suggest doing this cautiously, e.g. have #SB827 apply where HAA does - to objective standards; vs being preempted by any local demo control provision, which may be wide & discretionary. Consider SF's: demos blockable if projects judged to alter n'hood character. c/@cayimby."
 
&nbsp;
Anonymous user