Anonymous user
SB827: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 309:
== Proposals ==
=== Exempt or apply differently to certain areas ===
Matthewplan @matthewplan<br/> Replying to @YIMBYwiki @housingforla and 2 others<br/> "5) Make clear this does not apply in historic districts or allow more than 1 extra floor in a specific plan area - unless allowed by jurisdiction."
Line 323 ⟶ 324:
==== Different triggers for different area median incomes ====
=== Add inclusionary housing requirement ===
==== Shane Phillips ====
Shane Phillips @shanedphillips<br/> “By far the biggest [concern] I've heard, and it's something I agree with, is the lack of any inclusionary requirements. This is a significant upzone for most areas, and a windfall for current owners. Should be relatively easy to require 10-15% affordable.
==== Ethan Elkind ====
Ethan Elkind. "[http://www.ethanelkind.com/mitigating-displacement-of-low-income-renters-from-new-transit-oriented-housing/. Mitigating Displacement Of Low-Income Renters From New Transit-Oriented Housing]." January 9, 2018. Suggestions:
Line 345 ⟶ 350:
=== Relocation assistance ===
==== Matthew Plan ====
@matthewplan<br/> Replying to @YIMBYwiki @housingforla and 2 others<br/> "3) density bonus housing replacement policies should be expanded to include housing relocation assistance and right of first refusal for new unit at same rent in new building."
==== Shane Phillips ====
Shane Phillips @shanedphillips [https://twitter.com/shanedphillips/status/950938801181925377 7:54 PM - 9 Jan 2018]<br/> "What would be a smart anti-displacement or displacement mitigation policy to integrate into #SB827? Recognizing that abundant housing is the most effective broad-based anti-displacement strategy, I think there's space for targeted mitigations too."
|