Anonymous user
SB827: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 309:
== Proposals ==
Exempt or apply differently to certain areas
==== Don't apply in historical districts ====▼
Matthewplan @matthewplan<br/> Replying to @YIMBYwiki @housingforla and 2 others<br/> "5) Make clear this does not apply in historic districts or allow more than 1 extra floor in a specific plan area - unless allowed by jurisdiction."▼
=== ===▼
==== Different triggers for different area median incomes ====
=== Kim-Mai Cutler @kimmaicutler [https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/960310482665029632 4:33 PM - 4 Feb 2018]<br/> "What amendments would you suggest that would account for disparate impacts? Would have different triggers for different area median incomes -- ie... much stronger override if the community has a median income that is greater than the state average." ===
=== Add inclusionary housing requirement ===
Line 394 ⟶ 409:
<br/> <br/> Matthew Plan @matthewplan<br/> Replying to @YIMBYwiki @housingforla and 2 others<br/> "I’ve commented on 1) need to make clear this can apply on sites that don’t allow multifamily today like SF and C zones . Density bonus usually requires a site that allows 5 units before any bonus. Could amend 5 unit limit for all projects (not a bad idea) or remove Use limits." ===
▲
▲=== Don't apply in historical districts ===
▲Matthewplan @matthewplan<br/> Replying to @YIMBYwiki @housingforla and 2 others<br/> "5) Make clear this does not apply in historic districts or allow more than 1 extra floor in a specific plan area - unless allowed by jurisdiction."
| |||