Revision as of 01:12, 10 January 2018 (view source) imported>Tmccormick No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:13, 10 January 2018 (view source) imported>Tmccormick No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 136:   === ~~Does, could,~~Would or ~~would~~could this ~~lead to~~ support good mixed-use development and Transit Oriented Development (TOD), or hinder it?  === [[File:TheGreaterMarin-TOD-diagram.png\|thumb\|right\|~~400px~~500px\|good Transit Oriented Design. from The Greater Marin]] see David Edmondson. “[[http://www.thegreatermarin.org/blog/2018/1/8/what-transit-oriented-development-should-look-like http://www.thegreatermarin.org/blog/2018/1/8/what-transit-oriented-development-should-look-like] What transit-oriented development should look like.]” ''The Greater Marin'' blog, 8 January 2018.  ~~===   ===~~ === @DanKeshet 8 Jan 2018<br/> “Common concern that it might not apply to commercially-zoned property, allowing cities to zone those low-rise. (Why not apply the same rules to commercial properties?) Related: if developers can overrule commercial zoning, will it allow mixed use?” ===

SB827: Difference between revisions

SB827 (view source)