SB827: Difference between revisions

29 bytes removed ,  6 years ago
no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
Line 18:
== Concerns  ==
 
===   ===
 
 
=== Concerns and involvement of local resident stakeholders could be overridenoverridden ===
 
Richard Hall‏&nbsp; @rihallix&nbsp; [https://twitter.com/rihallix/status/949786475071094784 3:35 PM - 6 Jan 2018] from San Rafael, CA<br/> Replying to @TaupeAvenger<br/> "The community no longer has a say. #sb827 forces zoning changes by state fiat. With #sb35 passed all voices of resident stakeholders, councils, mayors are forcibly suppressed. Developers take control."
Line 30:
@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747494371643394 6 Jan 2018].&nbsp;<br/> "As for stopping cities from cutting bus routes, I would say do it based on current service *or* service that existed on Jan. 1, 2018."
 
=== &nbsp; ===
 
=== Could lead to demolition and displacement in low-income areas ===
Line 39 ⟶ 38:
*blog post:&nbsp;"[http://www.crenshawsubway.org/sb_827_must_be_stopped_to_protect_south_la SB 827 Is a Declaration of War on South LA]."&nbsp;''Crenshaw Subway&nbsp;Coalition&nbsp;''blog, 5 Jan 2018.
 
&nbsp;
 
=== new multi-story housing could negatively impact neighbors ===
 
&nbsp;
 
 
=== Upzoing could create pressure for less well-off homeowners to sell and relocate.&nbsp; ===
Line 77 ⟶ 76:
&nbsp;
 
=== Does, could, or would this lead to&nbsp; wanted mixed-use development&nbsp; ===
 
&nbsp;
Anonymous user