SB827: Difference between revisions

Improved wording of summary. Noted that Sasha Aickin's map is unofficial, added his disclaimer. Corrected Goodman > Goodmon and added his title.
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Rihallix
(Improved wording of summary. Noted that Sasha Aickin's map is unofficial, added his disclaimer. Corrected Goodman > Goodmon and added his title.)
Line 2:
[[File:1965-Market-Street-Rendering-2017-85-feet.jpg|thumb|right|500px|85-feet hight 1965 Market St, San Francisco]]
 
'''SB 827''' (Senate Bill 827, "Transit-rich Housing Bonus") is proposed 2018 California state legislation that would '''encourage high-density housing development anywhere in the vicinity of regular transit service'''. It would grant a "transit-rich housing bonus" to residential developments in such areas, allowing exemption from certain typical zoning limitations such as maximum density or required provision of parking, and allowing up to 85 feet building height depending on streets 45 feet or wider streetswithin near1/4 majormile of high quality transit corridors, to 45 feet on narrower streets within 1/2 mile of transit stops. It was introduced by San Francisco State Senator Scott Wiener on January 3, 2018.  (Principal coauthor: Senator Skinner; Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Ting). [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB827 Bill text].
 
 
Line 8:
== Resources (maps etc) ==
 
<br/> '''Unofficial Map Showing Areas Where Zoning Would Be Affected'''<br/> Sasha Aickin, formerly CTO of Redfin, created an interactive California map showing transit-rich areas according to current bill, and partially complete transit-route data:<br/> [https://transitrichhousing.org/ https://transitrichhousing.org/].
 
Aickin is not a transit professional, state or government employee. He produced this unofficial map in his spare time. He is an advocate for SB827. He states "I make no warranties as to the correctness of this map, and by using this map, you agree that you understand that."
&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;
 
== Supporters ==
Line 39 ⟶ 37:
Summary from Legislative Counsel's Digest (in [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB827 bill text]):&nbsp;
 
"The Planning and Zoning Law requires, when an applicant proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of a local government, that the city, county, or city and county provide the developer with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or for the donation of land within the development if the developer, among other things, agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents.<br/> <br/> "This bill would authorize a transit-rich housing project to receive a transit-rich housing bonus. The bill would define a transit-rich housing project as a residential development project the parcels of which are all within a 1/2 mile radius of a major transit stop or a 1/4 mile radius of a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are further defined. The bill would exempt a project awarded a housing opportunity bonus from various requirements, including maximum controls on residential density or floor area ratio, minimum automobile parking requirements, design standards that restrict the applicant’s ability to construct the maximum number of units consistent with any applicable building code, and maximum height limitations, as provided.<br/> <br/> The bill would declare that its provisions address a matter of statewide concern and apply equally to all cities and counties in this state, including a charter city."
 
The bill would create the transit-rich housing bous as&nbsp;new California Government Code sub-section 65917.7, thus within Chapter 4.3, "Density Bonuses and Other Incentives." The required purpose of such incentives anywhere in this Chapter is "contribute significantly to the economic feasibility of lower income housing." according to Section 65917.&nbsp;
Line 52 ⟶ 50:
 
Elements of the bill are quite similar to previous California bills for transit-oriented development, such as the 2016 Los Angeles&nbsp;Measure JJJ.&nbsp;&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;
 
== Concerns&nbsp; ==
Line 61 ⟶ 57:
Richard Hall‏&nbsp; @rihallix&nbsp; [https://twitter.com/rihallix/status/949786475071094784 3:35 PM - 6 Jan 2018] from San Rafael, CA<br/> Replying to @TaupeAvenger<br/> "The community no longer has a say. #sb827 forces zoning changes by state fiat. With #sb35 passed all voices of resident stakeholders, councils, mayors are forcibly suppressed. Developers take control."
 
@Hyper_lexic<br/> "I think it might go too far in the reach - minimum 45’ zoning on current residential side streets would be a real shock.<br/> &nbsp;"
 
&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;
 
=== Could lead to demolition and displacement in low-income areas ===
 
Damian Goodmon, Executive Director of the Crenshaw Subway Coalition
Damian Goodman
 
*(@damianISgoodman) on [https://twitter.com/damienISgoodmon/status/949104538870403072 Twitter, 4 Jan 2018]).<br/> "Final word for tonight on &nbsp;@Scott_Wiener's SB 827: Has anyone denied that the bill would lead to massive demolition of housing in low-income 'hoods like South LA? Heck, isn't that exactly what the YIMBYs are applauding? #SB827 #Colonizers #Gentrification
Anonymous user