SB827: Difference between revisions

 

== Concerns  ==

 

=== Concerns and involvement of local resident stakeholders could be overridden ===

@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747494371643394 6 Jan 2018].&nbsp;<br/> "As for stopping cities from cutting bus routes, I would say do it based on current service *or* service that existed on Jan. 1, 2018."

 

 

=== Could lead to demolition and displacement in low-income areas ===

*blog post:&nbsp;"[http://www.crenshawsubway.org/sb_827_must_be_stopped_to_protect_south_la SB 827 Is a Declaration of War on South LA]."&nbsp;''Crenshaw Subway&nbsp;Coalition&nbsp;''blog, 5 Jan 2018.

 

 

=== new multi-story housing could negatively impact neighbors ===

&nbsp;

 

 

=== Upzoing could create pressure for less well-off homeowners to sell and relocate.&nbsp; ===

@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747033795153921 6 Jan 2018].&nbsp;&nbsp;<br/> "Setbacks and lot coverage rules that make the height limits weak. I would recommend forcing cities to accommodate FAR 2 within 45' zones, FAR 2.5 in 55' zones, and FAR 4 in 85' zones.

 

 

@MarketUrbanism [https://twitter.com/MarketUrbanism/status/949747331099918338 6 Jan 2018]:<br/> "15-min headways needs to be defined more specifically. I would recommend defining it as total service along a route (so interlining is okay), and define it as, say, four buses within the 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. hours."&nbsp;

&nbsp;

 

 

&nbsp;

 

=== Pending nuclear holocaust makes planning exercises like this pointless ===