Anonymous user
SB827: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Jhestia No edit summary |
imported>Jhestia No edit summary |
||
Line 327:
Line 349 ⟶ 350:
Greg Morrow @gregmorrow [https://twitter.com/gregmorrow/status/962104297700802561 3:21 PM - 9 Feb 2018]<br/> I also suggested using base/max densities, wherein over base = local amenity fund contribute to pay for local community's self-determined top priorities (e.g. parks, cleanup, safety, childcare, etc). Bottom line: local communities must benefit more directly from redevelopment.
Greg Morrow @gregmorrow [https://twitter.com/gregmorrow/status/962106039263899649 3:28 PM - 9 Feb 2018]<br/> "Planners and policy-makers, esp in LA, have typically used a hammer and screwdriver to achieve outcomes. But there are many more tools in the toolbox, esp fiscal tools, e.g. land value capture, Mello-Roos special assessment districts, contributions to community amenity funds, etc." <br/>
==== Richard K. Green - auction off development rights ====
Richard K. Green @keynesianr [https://twitter.com/keynesianr/status/962103896339488768 3:20 PM - 9 Feb 2018]<br/> Replying to @gregmorrow @drschweitzer @markvalli<br/> "Or even better, auction off the development rights. That would maximize revenue."
|