Anonymous user
SB827: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Rihallix (Added new section "Intended or Assumed Reduction in Traffic & Increased Transit Adoption are Fallacies" (was separate from section "would this support good mixed use & TOD") |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 50:
Elements of the bill are quite similar to previous California bills for transit-oriented development, such as the 2016 Los Angeles Measure JJJ.
== Concerns ==
Line 83 ⟶ 84:
*local residents who have been displaced or are at risk of displacement should have priority access to these new homes.
<br/> Tim McCormick @yimbywiki [https://twitter.com/YIMBYwiki/status/951200278664986624 10 Jan 2018]: <br/> "as a displacement mitigation policy for #SB827 housing bill, we could take as one model [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&division=7.&title=1.&part=&chapter=16.&article= California's Relocation Assistance code], applied in eminent-domain type situations:<br/>
=== Upzoing could create pressure for less well-off homeowners to sell and relocate. ===
|