SB827: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
Line 145:
 
@fromira<br/> "Sure, but I think it’s fine for cities to mandate ground floor retail near transit. Transit-oriented coffee is one of the key features of transit."
 
 
=== <br/> In lower-demand places, this could push development *outside* the transit-rich radius ===
Line 150 ⟶ 151:
Alex Visotzky @alexvisotzky&nbsp;Jan 4<br/> "there's a lot of places (in LA City, in LA County, all over the state) where there's transit but the development being proposed is shorter than that 45-85 feet height minimum--not sure the rents & land values will support that kind of density. parking changes will help, yes 9/267"
 
Alex Visotzky @alexvisotzky&nbsp;Jan 4<br/> "I'm worried that what developers do there is move outside that half mile radius to get their projects built and we end up seeing more sprawl, more development AWAY from transit. again, I need to think about this one more. 10/267"<br/> &nbsp;
 
See [https://twitter.com/YIMBYwiki/status/950265064937873408 full thread] with Alex Visotzky, Shane Phillips, and Tim McCormick / YIMBYwiki.&nbsp;<br/> &nbsp;
 
=== <br/> This would concentrate new housing next to health hazards, since transit-rich locations are usually near high-traffic roads&nbsp; ===
Anonymous user