Right to housing: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
Line 57:
 
= Critiques  =
 
== Robert Ellickson ==
 
Ellickson, Robert C. [1992] "[http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/459 The Untenable Case for an Unconditional Right to Shelter]."  15 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Policy 17 1992.  Available as Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 459: [http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/459 http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/459].
Line 65 ⟶ 67:
 
Summary: 
<blockquote>''Although currently neither politically nor fiscally feasible, the notion that access to inexpensive, presumably high-quality housing should be a government-guaranteed universal right would be a terrible idea even if it were popular and affordable. The proposition fails on three counts. It isn't necessary. It doesn't make economic sense. And, most compelling, were such a policy to be implemented, its putative beneficiaries would not thank us. Even if we should not promulgate ''a right to decent, affordable housing,'' we want to assure that all Americans have access to decent, affordable housing. Happily, we can count on the private housing market (coupled with rising prosperity) to serve 95 percent of the country's households. Serving the remaining 5 percent requires concerted measures to scale back onerous housing regulations that prevent the private housing sector from meeting the needs of lower- income and untypical households.''</blockquote>
<blockquote>
''Although currently neither politically nor fiscally feasible, the notion that access to inexpensive, presumably high-quality housing should be a government-guaranteed universal right would be a terrible idea even if it were popular and affordable. The proposition fails on three counts. It isn't necessary. It doesn't make economic sense. And, most compelling, were such a policy to be implemented, its putative beneficiaries would not thank us. Even if we should not promulgate ''a right to decent, affordable housing,'' we want to assure that all Americans have access to decent, affordable housing. Happily, we can count on the private housing market (coupled with rising prosperity) to serve 95 percent of the country's households. Serving the remaining 5 percent requires concerted measures to scale back onerous housing regulations that prevent the private housing sector from meeting the needs of lower- income and untypical households.''
</blockquote>
 
----
 
Line 88 ⟶ 87:
**[http://www.internal-displacement.org/8025708F004BE3B1/(httpInfoFiles)/C90EE08CC6A733ABC12574C00049C81D/$file/G0810545.pdf Report to UN HRC, 2008. A/HRC/7/16]
**[http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/13session/A-HRC-13-20.pdf REport to UN HRC, 2009. A/HRC/13/20]<br/> &nbsp;
 
 
*United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) - Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). "[https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HousingRightsen.pdf Housing Rights Legislation:&nbsp;Review of International and National Legal Instruments]." Nairobi, 2002.&nbsp;[https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HousingRightsen.pdf https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HousingRightsen.pdf].&nbsp;<br/> &nbsp;
Anonymous user