Residential nexus analysis: Difference between revisions

From HousingWiki
Content added Content deleted
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


A '''residential nexus analysis '''(RNA)''' '''is a study usually conducted or commissioned usually by a California municipal government, regarding the effect of new [[Market_rate_housing|market‐rate]] housing on the need for subsidized/mandated affordable housing or other city services. It is generally designed to create a legally defensible justification for establishing city [[Inclusionary_zoning|inclusionary zoning]] requirements (“IHRs” or “inclusionary percentages”) and/or “in‐lieu” fees, or others such as development impact fees.  They are employed particularly because California courts have ruled [citation needed] that such policies and fees must be based on a reasonable showing of ''nexus, ''or causal relationship, between the market-rate housing and the inclusionary policies or fees imposed by cities. 
----

 

 


== References ==
== References ==


 
Randolph, Yonathan. "[https://blog.yonathan.org/posts/2017-04-stop-quoting-the-residential-nexus-analysis.html Stop Quoting the Residential Nexus Analysis.]" Blog post, 15 Apr 2017. https://blog.yonathan.org/posts/2017-04-stop-quoting-the-residential-nexus-analysis.html.


*Cray, Adam F. "[http://www.cbia.org/uploads/5/1/2/6/51268865/residential_nexus_analysis_in_support_of_california_complete.pdf The Use of Residential Nexus Analysis in Support of California’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinances: A Critical Evaluation]."<br/> November 2011. (based on earlier UC Berkeley MPP master's thesis; funded through a grant from the&nbsp;California Homebuilding Foundation).&nbsp;[http://www.cbia.org/uploads/5/1/2/6/51268865/residential_nexus_analysis_in_support_of_california_complete.pdf http://www.cbia.org/uploads/5/1/2/6/51268865/residential_nexus_analysis_in_support_of_california_complete.pdf].<br/> &nbsp;
Trauss, Sonja. "[https://sfbarf.tumblr.com/post/131634715010/often-quoted-san-francisco-nexus-study-is-junk Often Quoted San Francisco 'Nexus Study'&nbsp;is Junk Science.]" SFBARF, Oct 2,&nbsp;2015.&nbsp;[https://sfbarf.tumblr.com/post/131634715010/often-quoted-san-francisco-nexus-study-is-junk https://sfbarf.tumblr.com/post/131634715010/often-quoted-san-francisco-nexus-study-is-junk].
*Randolph, Yonathan. "[https://blog.yonathan.org/posts/2017-04-stop-quoting-the-residential-nexus-analysis.html Stop Quoting the Residential Nexus Analysis.]" Blog post,&nbsp;15 Apr 2017. [https://blog.yonathan.org/posts/2017-04-stop-quoting-the-residential-nexus-analysis.html https://blog.yonathan.org/posts/2017-04-stop-quoting-the-residential-nexus-analysis.html].<br/> &nbsp;
*Trauss, Sonja. "[https://sfbarf.tumblr.com/post/131634715010/often-quoted-san-francisco-nexus-study-is-junk Often Quoted San Francisco 'Nexus Study'&nbsp;is Junk Science.]" SFBARF, Oct 2,&nbsp;2015.&nbsp;[https://sfbarf.tumblr.com/post/131634715010/often-quoted-san-francisco-nexus-study-is-junk https://sfbarf.tumblr.com/post/131634715010/often-quoted-san-francisco-nexus-study-is-junk].

Latest revision as of 23:31, 16 June 2017

residential nexus analysis (RNA) is a study usually conducted or commissioned usually by a California municipal government, regarding the effect of new market‐rate housing on the need for subsidized/mandated affordable housing or other city services. It is generally designed to create a legally defensible justification for establishing city inclusionary zoning requirements (“IHRs” or “inclusionary percentages”) and/or “in‐lieu” fees, or others such as development impact fees.  They are employed particularly because California courts have ruled [citation needed] that such policies and fees must be based on a reasonable showing of nexus, or causal relationship, between the market-rate housing and the inclusionary policies or fees imposed by cities. 

 

 

References