Rent regulation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
Line 1:
 
''"Rent control" redirects here. ''
[[File:Rent-Control--FringeNYC-2016.jpg|500px|thumb|right|from ’Rent Control’ show at FringeNYC 2016]]
 
== Overview ==
Line 45 ⟶ 46:
 
 
 
 
== References ==
Line 50 ⟶ 52:
*Diamond, Rebecca, Tim McQuade, & Franklin Qian (2017). “[http://conference.nber.org/confer//2017/PEf17/Diamond_McQuade_Qian.pdf The Effects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and Inequality: Evidence from San Francisco].” NBER working paper, October 11, 2017.&nbsp;[http://conference.nber.org/confer//2017/PEf17/Diamond_McQuade_Qian.pdf http://conference.nber.org/confer//2017/PEf17/Diamond_McQuade_Qian.pdf].<br/> ''"Abstract:&nbsp;<br/> In this paper, we exploit quasi-experimental variation in the assignment of rent control in San Francisco to study its impacts on tenants, landlords, and the rental market as a whole. Leveraging new micro data which tracks an individual’s migration over time,&nbsp;'''we find that rent control increased the probability a renter stayed at their address by close to 20 percent. At the same time, we find that landlords whose properties were exogenously covered by rent control reduced their supply of available rental housing by 15%, by either converting to condos/TICs, selling to owner occupied, or redeveloping buildings. This led to a city-wide rent increase of 7%&nbsp;'''and caused $5 billion of welfare losses to all renters. We develop a dynamic, structural model of neighborhood choice to evaluate the welfare impacts of our reduced form effects. We find that&nbsp;'''rent control offered large benefits to impacted tenants during the 1995-2012 period, averaging between $2300 and $6600 per person each year, with aggregate benefits totaling over $390 million annually.'''&nbsp;The substantial welfare losses due to decreased housing supply could be mitigated if insurance against large rent increases was provided as a form of government social insurance, instead of a regulated mandate on landlords."''<br/> &nbsp;
*East Bay For Everyone. "[https://www.scribd.com/document/350029454/Ab-1506-Support#from_embed RE: AB 1506 - Residential Rent Control: Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act.]" (letter). 2017.&nbsp;[https://www.scribd.com/document/350029454/Ab-1506-Support#from_embed https://www.scribd.com/document/350029454/Ab-1506-Support#from_embed].<br/> &nbsp;
*Heskin, Allan D., Ned Levine & Mark Garrett. “The Effects of Vacancy Control: A Spatial Analysis of Four California Cities.” ''Journal of the American Planning Association'', Volume 66, 2000 - Issue 2, Pages 162-176. DOI: 10.1080/01944360008976096.&nbsp;<br/> [https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976096 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976096]<br/> ''“Abstract:&nbsp;<br/> This article examines changes between 1980 and 1990 in the number of rental units and the demographic composition of tenants in four California cities that adopted rent control with vacancy control provisions. Six border areas within the four cities were compared to border areas of adjoining cities that did not have vacancy control. A spatial lag regression model was constructed to estimate the changes in regional and neighborhood components in addition to vacancy control policies. Vacancy control contributed to lower rents and longer tenure by tenants compared to non-vacancy-controlled areas. There were also fewer rental units in part because of a shift from rental housing to owner-occupied housing.”''<br/> &nbsp;
*Initiative on Global Markets (at University of Chicago Booth School) [IGM 2012]. “[http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/rent-control Rent Control]” [poll of economic experts].&nbsp;<br/> February 7th, 2012.&nbsp;[http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/rent-control. http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/rent-control.&nbsp;]<br/> ''Poll statement:&nbsp; “Local ordinances that limit rent increases for some rental housing units, such as in New York and San Francisco, have had a positive impact over the past three decades on the amount and quality of broadly affordable rental housing in cities that have used them.”&nbsp;<br/> 40 respondents.&nbsp;<br/> 0 Strongly Agree<br/> 2% Agree<br/> 7% Uncertain<br/> 49% Disagree<br/> 32% Strongly Disagree<br/> 2% No Opinion''<br/> &nbsp;
*Legislative Analysts Office (California).&nbsp;[http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2017/170629.pdf Review of proposed statutory initiative pertaining to rent control (A.G. File No. 17-0041)].&nbsp;12 Dec 2017. [http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2017/170629.pdf http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2017/170629.pdf].<br/> &nbsp;
Anonymous user