NIMBY: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
Line 20:
Hankinson [2018] offers this definition and statement of problem: 
<blockquote>''‘Not In My Back Yard’ or ‘NIMBY’ opposition (Dear, 1992; Schively, 2007) creates a collective action problem for the housing supply. Despite supporting supply citywide, residents individually have an incentive to ‘defect’ and block new housing proposed for their own neighborhood. If the permitting process allows individual residents to defect from a group interest of more supply, then NIMBYism will not only lead to less new housing overall, but to a level of supply below majoritarian preferences. This ability of NIMBYism to undermine collective action extends beyond housing to an array of land uses, from clean energy facilities (Stokes, 2016) and landfills (Lake, 1996) to homeless shelters and social service centers (Dear, 1992). So long as the costs are spatially concentrated, even broadly supported land uses will face NIMBY opposition.''</blockquote>
=== Monkkonen & Manville (2018): Anti-developer sentiment ===
 
== Monkkonen & Manville (2018): Anti-developer sentiment ==
 
Monkkonen, Paavo, and Michael Manville. "[http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/Documents/areas/ctr/ziman/2018-04WP.pdf Opposition to Development or Opposition to Developers?: Survey Evidence from Los Angeles County on Attitudes towards New Housing.]" Working paper. February 22, 2018.
Line 32 ⟶ 31:
 
Nall noted in tweet announcing paper: "includes many of the findings from our earlier working paper, 'Beyond NIMBYism' "
<blockquote>''"Summary [drawn from introduction section. -ed] &nbsp;:<br/> We find that messages designed to appeal to economic liberals by emphasizing the effects of additional housing development on local housing prices generally have a minimal effect, and, depending on how economic arguments are framed, can even reduce liberal homeowners’ support of housing development. Additional messages that also emphasize the corresponding benefits of new housing on affordability for lower- and middle-income families generally offset this priming of homeowner interest. These results confirm that Americans do express substantial self-interested political behavior when the stakes are visible and consequential—even when this contradicts prior liberal commitments. Homeowners prioritize their interests as homeowners over their prior ideological commitments."''</blockquote>
<blockquote>
&nbsp;
''"Summary [drawn from introduction section. -ed] :<br/> We find that messages designed to appeal to economic liberals by emphasizing the effects of additional housing development on local housing prices generally have a minimal effect, and, depending on how economic arguments are framed, can even reduce liberal homeowners’ support of housing development. Additional messages that also emphasize the corresponding benefits of new housing on affordability for lower- and middle-income families generally offset this priming of homeowner interest. These results confirm that Americans do express substantial self-interested political behavior when the stakes are visible and consequential—even when this contradicts prior liberal commitments. Homeowners prioritize their interests as homeowners over their prior ideological commitments."''
</blockquote>
<BR>
 
=== Pendall [1999] ===
Line 49 ⟶ 46:
&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;
 
 
== in San Francisco Bay Area ==
Line 112 ⟶ 109:
*Livezey, Emilie Travel. “Hazardous waste.” The Christian Science Monitor, November 6, 1980.<br/> [cited by Oxford English Dictionary as the first published use of the term].<br/> &nbsp;
*Monkkonen, Paavo, and Michael Manville. "[http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/Documents/areas/ctr/ziman/2018-04WP.pdf Opposition to Development or Opposition to Developers?: Survey Evidence from Los Angeles County on Attitudes towards New Housing]." Working paper. February 22, 2018.&nbsp;[http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/Documents/areas/ctr/ziman/2018-04WP.pdf http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/Documents/areas/ctr/ziman/2018-04WP.pdf].
*&nbsp;
*
 
Nall, Clayton,&nbsp;and Will Marble (2018). "[https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QuqlPHqYb_Eu6gxwDNHneWEtSkGjgfwJ Where Interests Trump Ideology: The Persistent Influence of Homeownership in Local Development Politics]." Working paper, Feb 3 2018.&nbsp;<br/> [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QuqlPHqYb_Eu6gxwDNHneWEtSkGjgfwJ.  https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QuqlPHqYb_Eu6gxwDNHneWEtSkGjgfwJ.&nbsp;]<br/> &nbsp; &nbsp;"includes many of the findings from our earlier working paper, 'Beyond NIMBYism' "<br/> &nbsp;
 
*Iannarone, Sarah. “[http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/12/a_fix_for_portlands_growing_pa.html A fix for Portland's growing pains: Less 'NIMBY,' more unity.]" (Guest opinion). Dec 31, 2017<br/> [http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/12/a_fix_for_portlands_growing_pa.html http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/12/a_fix_for_portlands_growing_pa.html].<br/> &nbsp;
Anonymous user