NIMBY: Difference between revisions

*Pendall, Rolf. 1999. “Opposition to Housing: NIMBY and Beyond.” Urban Affairs Review 35 (1): 112–36.<br/> [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pt6_CKnturB0dJn1lO-oFaWPlCDDQ4Sq [1]].<br/> &nbsp;

*Portland growth survey shows 'not in my backyard' attitude | KGW.com. (2016, August 1). Retrieved from [http://www.kgw.com/news/local/portland-growth-survey-shows-not-in-my-backyard-attitude/63872102 [1]].<br/> &nbsp;

*Rosenblum, Constance. "[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/realestate/sure-build-it-in-my-backyard.html Sure, Build It in My Backyard.]" [profile of New York YIMBY founder Nikolai Fedak]. &nbsp;April 4, 2014. [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/realestate/sure-build-it-in-my-backyard.html https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/realestate/sure-build-it-in-my-backyard.html].<br/> &nbsp;

*Schively,&nbsp;Carissa.&nbsp;2007. “Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research.”&nbsp;Journal of Planning Literature&nbsp;21&nbsp;(3):&nbsp;255–66.<br/> ''"Abstract:<br/> A substantial amount of research relative to the not in my backyard (NIMBY) and locally unwanted land use (LULU) phenomena has been conducted during the past two decades. The article begins by illustrating the complex nature of these phenomena, noting variation in the types of facilities considered LULUs, the range of participants who exhibit NIMBY responses, and the varied manner in which these phenomena have been described. The focus of the article then moves to the influence of perceptions relative to NIMBY and methods available to respond to NIMBY concerns. The article summarizes research in these areas with the purpose of reminding us of what we know about NIMBY and LULU phenomena and what continues to challenge planning practitioners. The literature review points to research opportunities and the need to integrate the findings of previously distinct areas of inquiry to inform planning practice."''<br/> &nbsp;