Homeless encampments: Difference between revisions

From HousingWiki
Content added Content deleted
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
 
 



==   ==


== Background on tent cities/encampments ==
== Background on tent cities/encampments ==



==   ==


=== NCH 2010 "Tent Cities in America: Pacific Coast" report ===
=== NCH 2010 "Tent Cities in America: Pacific Coast" report ===



===   ===


National Coalition for the Homeless (2010). "[ttps://www.nationalhomeless.org/publications/Tent%20Cities%20Report%20FINAL%203-10-10.pdf Tent Cities in America: A Pacific Coast Report]."
National Coalition for the Homeless (2010). "[ttps://www.nationalhomeless.org/publications/Tent%20Cities%20Report%20FINAL%203-10-10.pdf Tent Cities in America: A Pacific Coast Report]."


prefatory quote: 
prefatory quote: 
<blockquote>''“Tent Cities are American’s de facto waiting room for affordable and accessible housing. The idea of someone living in a tent (or other encampment) in this country says little about the decisions made by those who dwell within and so much more about our nation’s inability to adequately respond to those in need.”<br/> &nbsp; -Neil Donovan, Executive Director, National Coalition for the Homeless&nbsp;''</blockquote> <blockquote>
<blockquote>
''“Tent Cities are American’s de facto waiting room for affordable and accessible housing. The idea of someone living in a tent (or other encampment) in this country says little about the decisions made by those who dwell within and so much more about our nation’s inability to adequately respond to those in need.”<br/> &nbsp; -Neil Donovan, Executive Director, National Coalition for the Homeless&nbsp;''
</blockquote> <blockquote>
"Tent Cities in America, A Pacific Coast Report lays the groundwork for:<br/> • Understanding the diversity and conditions under which tent cities are created<br/> • Comparing various levels of community acceptance, regulation, and governance<br/> • Advocating safe, legal, and effective methods and practices of encampment."
"Tent Cities in America, A Pacific Coast Report lays the groundwork for:<br/> • Understanding the diversity and conditions under which tent cities are created<br/> • Comparing various levels of community acceptance, regulation, and governance<br/> • Advocating safe, legal, and effective methods and practices of encampment."


Line 36: Line 34:
&nbsp;
&nbsp;


== &nbsp; ==



== <br/> HUCIRP+&nbsp;proposal ==
== HUCIRP+&nbsp;proposal ==


("use-SUR-plus"):<br/> &nbsp;
("use-SUR-plus"):<br/> &nbsp;

Revision as of 10:40, 23 December 2019

HUCIRP logo

HUCIRP is a program of Portland, OR's city government that 

"is responsible for coordinating cleanup/abatement of unsanctioned campsites on City and ODOT [Oregon Department of Transportation] owned properties/rights-of-way within the City of Portland while managing the City’s One Point of Contact campsite reporting system. HUCIRP develops and implements harm/impact reduction strategies in addition to coordinating services with other agencies and jurisdictions within the Portland Metro area."  [City of Portland HUCIRP site]. 

(pronunciation: "hue-SURP" - like "usurp"). 

 


Background on tent cities/encampments

NCH 2010 "Tent Cities in America: Pacific Coast" report

National Coalition for the Homeless (2010). "[ttps://www.nationalhomeless.org/publications/Tent%20Cities%20Report%20FINAL%203-10-10.pdf Tent Cities in America: A Pacific Coast Report]."

prefatory quote: 

“Tent Cities are American’s de facto waiting room for affordable and accessible housing. The idea of someone living in a tent (or other encampment) in this country says little about the decisions made by those who dwell within and so much more about our nation’s inability to adequately respond to those in need.”
  -Neil Donovan, Executive Director, National Coalition for the Homeless 

"Tent Cities in America, A Pacific Coast Report lays the groundwork for:
• Understanding the diversity and conditions under which tent cities are created
• Comparing various levels of community acceptance, regulation, and governance
• Advocating safe, legal, and effective methods and practices of encampment."

1st site profiled: Dignity Village, Portland Oregon
• Est. 2000 (Legally Recognized in 2001)
• Population: 60
• Location: Public Land / Urban Periphery / Permanent Site
• Regulatory Status: Leased Public Land with City Contract to Operate.
• Funding Source: The Community’s Own 501 c (3) Nonprofit
• Structures: Wooden structures measuring up to 10x15 ft. 

"Unlike other homeless encampments that are sponsored by local governments or outside nonprofits, Dignity Village’s model of complete self-governance and funding gives the homeless a unique sense of autonomy and ownership of their community. Having a permanent site (unlike other Pacific Northwest homeless encampments, which move to different churches every ninety days) furthers this sense of ownership and allows the homeless to make both tangible physical and social improvements to their community in a way that is not possible in a mobile community. Many of the homeless describe the village as a “stepping stone” to a better situation and the stability offered by the permanent nature of the village, which allows people to keep and store their items in one place, improve their residence and public assets, and be a part of a community that defines itself not simply as one of homeless people, but an eco-village and intentional community founded on socialistic and communal beliefs. All of this contribute to Dignity’s mission and sets it apart from the other encampments."

"Villagers see their model not only as a viable alternative to an overburdened shelter system, but as one with significant benefits that offer their residents the stability, autonomy, and a platform for a better life. The density, publicness, and tangibility of the village attracts non-profits, students, and service groups in a way to support homeless people that is unique to other homeless outreach work found in cities with dispersed homeless populations or with traditional shelter systems. While Dignity Village is no longer classified as a tent city, or even a homeless encampment, it is particularly relevant to this report as an evolutionary development that sprang from such a community ten years ago. The community consciously sees itself as a national and even international model; advocates and government officials from across the nation and world have visited to learn about the community. "

 

 


HUCIRP+ proposal

("use-SUR-plus"):
 

 

 

 

HUCIRP "Strategic Plan 2019-2021." 

Strategic Goal #3 IDENTIFY/CREATE LAWFUL PLACES FOR PEOPLE TO SLEEP
• Continue to work with the Joint Office of Homeless Services, Multnomah County, and other jurisdictions on public space management strategies that reduce the need for campsite cleanup interventions which require the removal and storage of personal property.
• Implement a model of collaboration and cooperation with Portland Housing Bureau, Prosper Portland, OMF-HUCIRP, and property owning bureaus to identify underutilized City properties, or properties in pre-development stages, that could be used for alternative shelter purposes to provide lawful and organized places for people experiencing homelessness to sleep.

 

 

 


References