Anonymous user
Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act reform: Difference between revisions
Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act reform (view source)
Revision as of 23:08, 11 January 2018
, 6 years agono edit summary
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
imported>Tmccormick No edit summary |
||
Line 4:
A similar measure was proposed as legislative bill [[AB1506|AB 1506]], filed in 2017, but this failed to pass out of the housing committee in a vote on 11 January 2018. <br/> <br/> The [https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/17-0041%20(Affordable%20Housing)_0.pdf filing letter] contains text of proposed Act. <br/>
== Proponents ==
Line 53 ⟶ 54:
== Issues / Concerns ==
=== Problems with using intiative process ===
Assemblymember Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica), sponsor of [[AB1506]] repeal bill:
<blockquote>
''“At the same time, while I understand why some want to put this change on the ballot, it is never ideal to address a complicated issue like this through the initiative process,” Bloom said. “First and foremost, the initiative process is a simple up or down vote that does not allow for any public input, shuts down dialogue amongst stakeholders, and prevents anyone from making changes to address any concerns raised by those impacted by the proposal.''
''“Secondly, if there are unintended consequences down the road that need to be fixed, it will require a 2/3 vote of each house of the Legislature – a threshold not easily achieved. For these reasons, something this complicated is better left to the legislative process. AB 1506 remains a vehicle for responsible dialogue and, I hope, legislation that will ease the economic burden that is affecting so many Californians.”<br/> - quoted in ''
</blockquote>
=== what's the point of repealing C-H if landlords can just convert to condos? ===
Line 67 ⟶ 78:
@housingforLA supports.
Means-tested rent control
=== Combine rent control and upzoning ===
YIMBYwiki @YIMBYwiki [https://twitter.com/YIMBYwiki/status/951262198084464640 5:19 PM - 10 Jan 2018]<br/> Replying to @ebarcuzzi @MattRegan10 and 2 others<br/> "@TommSciortino another possible angle is to bundle/trade #CostaHawkins reform with major housing-creation support like #SB827"<br/>
Paavo Monkkonen @elpaavo 9:44 AM - 11 Jan 2018<br/> instead of arguing about which approach is better, do both!<br/> https://twitter.com/elpaavo/status/951510029969932288
Paavo Monkkonen @elpaavo<br/> I meant upzoning + rent control, both would be free! and one would even generate $$$
Dragonfly on Deck @IDoTheThinking [https://twitter.com/IDoTheThinking/status/951565727835635712 1:25 PM - 11 Jan 2018]<br/> "Tie the #RepealCostaHawkins bill with SB 827 so that they can work off each other. Subsequent votes."
this socialist blocks parvenus @TribTowerViews [https://twitter.com/TribTowerViews/status/951567673866928128 1:33 PM - 11 Jan 2018]<br/> Replying to @IDoTheThinking<br/> "Amend SB827 to add relocation payments, right of return and prevailing wage.<br/> Amend CH to allow RC on existing units and new construction after (x) years."
Brian Hanlon @hanlonbt [https://twitter.com/hanlonbt/status/951571175691337728 1:47 PM - 11 Jan 2018 ]<br/> Replying to @TribTowerViews @IDoTheThinking<br/> "SB 827 is going to be hard enough to pass as it is. Tenant advocates couldn't even get Costa Hawkins reform out of the policy committee chaired by its coauthor. SB 827 dies if we pair CH reform with it."
Victoria Fierce, legal anarchist @tdfischer_ [https://twitter.com/tdfischer_/status/951574226267357185 1:59 PM - 11 Jan 2018]<br/> Replying to @hanlonbt @cjg2127 and 2 others<br/> "This yimby also would love nothing more than pair CH with SB827 in a way that addresses all of the concerns about housing supply brought up in committee today such that everything passes and the fauxgressives get peeled off of the leftist/nimby nightmare coalition."
Dragonfly on Deck @IDoTheThinking [https://twitter.com/IDoTheThinking/status/951582628758487040 2:32 PM - 11 Jan 2018]<br/> Replying to @tdfischer_ @hanlonbt and 2 others<br/> "Pair them only in the sense that they both are voted on within close timeframes. It wouldnt be wise to actually couple those bills into 1 legislation. Right wing Homeowner associations are stronger than crazy peeps with blogs."
| |||