Advocacy strategies: Difference between revisions

From HousingWiki
Content added Content deleted
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
imported>Tmccormick
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


 
 



== Add new rungs to the ladder ==
== Add new rungs to the ladder ==


[https://twitter.com/YIMBYwiki '''YIMBYwiki'''‏&nbsp;@'''YIMBYwiki''']<small>&nbsp;[https://twitter.com/YIMBYwiki/status/937790091275022337 4 Dec 2017]&nbsp;</small><br/> Replying to&nbsp;[https://twitter.com/shanedphillips @'''shanedphillips''']<br/> [https://twitter.com/cbracy <s>@</s>'''cbracy'''] a messaging angle we've been exploring is: if ladder seems to be pulled up, perhaps what's in everyone's interests is to add new lower rungs - new forms of starter home like ownable/movable ADUs, small-lot subdivision, SFH conv to cluster c/[https://twitter.com/afahey <s>@</s>'''afahey''']
YIMBYwiki‏&nbsp;@YIMBYwiki<small>&nbsp;4 Dec 2017&nbsp;</small><br/> @cbracy a messaging angle we've been exploring is: if ladder seems to be pulled up, perhaps what's in everyone's interests is to add new lower rungs - new forms of starter home like ownable/movable ADUs, small-lot subdivision, SFH conv to cluster c/@afahey


&nbsp;
&nbsp;

Revision as of 22:31, 8 January 2018

 


Provide cover for local officials to say Yes

@YIMBYwiki: 
heard @Scott_Wiener and others make exactly this point (eg Scott here at #MTCcasa  http://baha.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?publish_id=949360eb-a465-11e7-b89c-00505691de41 ) We need to help provide cover for local officials so they can take a broader, longer-term, more inclusive view

 


Add new rungs to the ladder

YIMBYwiki‏ @YIMBYwiki 4 Dec 2017 
@cbracy a messaging angle we've been exploring is: if ladder seems to be pulled up, perhaps what's in everyone's interests is to add new lower rungs - new forms of starter home like ownable/movable ADUs, small-lot subdivision, SFH conv to cluster c/@afahey

 

 

References